Skip to main content

USE OF ABUSIVE LANGUAGE IN SOCIAL MEDIA:LEGAL LIABILITY

 

           USE OF ABUSIVE LANGUAGE IN SOCIAL MEDIA:LEGAL LIABILITY

                                                                                                   Sunidhi Chaudhry*

While social media allows anybody to express themselves and communicate with a big audience, it has also become a forum for harsh behaviour, abusive language, cyberbullying, and personal attacks, toxic, unpleasant, obscene, menacing, insulting, and despise for one's own identity. However, determining whether or not a comment or a post is abusive remains difficult and time-consuming, and most social media businesses are actively exploring for more efficient alternatives. This can be automated to help detect abusive comments, save websites, enhance user safety, and improve online arguments.

Social media has caught the imagination of india

No wonder , then , that Indians are among the most active on such platforms . The mobile revolution has further ensured that social media through various applications and devices .

There has been a rapid rise in the number of internet users in the past few years and so has increased the number of social media users around the world. We can now access many things with just a click . With this improving accessibility of social media networks and internet facility to every individual there is an equivalent increase in the crimes on social media platforms that include social bullying and social abuse .

We require a lot of manners and integrity to maintain the quality if social media but there is no such kind of education that is being given to the people. We see a lot of controversial fights that start just because of social media abuse but people instead of reporting it to the legal authorities take revenge and this is where starts a chain of social media abuse .With an amid rise in the internet users the laws of country didn't match the pace that can cope up with the rising crimes on social media. Abusing on social media can be of many types that range from mere use of foul language to disrespecting the individual and even to circulation of personal things on social media. Every country around the world is facing the issue of use of abusing on social media but because of a lot of social media users and easy accessibility of internet it becomes very difficult to find the culprit.Thus it has been a safe haven for the violators. The anonymity that social media ensures to the violators makes the subject even more complex. Social media is a mirror of society. The cause for the offences should be carefully studied and responded to by society with the connected work of people and the justice delivery mechanism. Occasional controversies are subsumed over a period, and thus these offences are being largely normalised. Justice delivery mechanisms appear to be very complex and inaccessible to women and the marginalised when it comes to offences related to social media. Owing to the technological complexity associated with cybercrimes, evidence collection and investigation are very complex and it’s often impossible for the agencies to hold the perpetrators accountable before law. There was section 66a of IT Act which worked to curb the the social bullying but Supreme Court held that act unconstitutional and abolished that act.The repeal of S.66A does not however result in an unrestricted right to free speech since analogous provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) will continue to apply to social media online viz. Intentionally Insulting Religion Or Religious Beliefs (S. 295A), Promoting Enmity Between Groups On Grounds Of Religion, Race Etc. (S. 153A), Defamation (S. 499), Statements conducing to Public Mischief (S. 505), Insulting The Modesty Of A Woman (S 509), Criminal Intimidation (S 506), Sedition (S124-A), etc. People can still ask for legal aid to counter social media abuse but they are not aware of the rights they have.


IT ACT 2000

The information technology Act which was enacted in the year 2000 to regulate and deal with the issues arising out of the section 66A of the IT Act has been enacted to regulate the social media law india. This section clearly restricts the transmission posting of unwanted messages and spam requests on social media platforms like facebook , Instagram etc. Further the law is against these activities. It also avails " fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression ".

Example of IT Act 2000 (sec.66A) case law

Shreya singhal and ors.

Vs.

Union of india AIR 2015 sc 1523

It was held that Supreme Court struck down section 66A of the IT ACT ,2000 related to restrictions on online speech , as unconstitutional

On grounds of violation the freedom of speech guaranteed under Article 19 (1) (a) of the constitution of India .

The Supreme Court also read down the section 79 and rules under the section. It was held that online intermediaries would only be obligated to take down content on receiving an order from a court or a government authority .

It ACT 2000

The Act provides a legal framework for electronic governance by giving recognition to electronic records and digital signatures. It also defines cyber crimes and prescribes penalties for them. The Act directed the formation of a Controller of Certifying Authorities to regulate the issuance of digital

Social media

Social media is changing the face of domestic violence by creating more opportunities and

private channels for abuse to take place .

It is also being used as an evidence in bullying , stalking , and domestic abuse .

Cyber stalking

It is the use of the internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual , group

or organization; it may include false accusations ,defamation, slander and libel .

Conclusion

With the amid technological explosion it becomes very difficult for a single individual to spread awareness about social media abuse but as responsible citizens it becomes our duty to teach everyone around us to use social media with morals and integrity , it is our duty to help the government in countering the increasing cases of social media abuse . It will take time but we along with the government can make this happen and there will be very few cases of social media abuse in the near future if we take this responsibility together .


*  Student of ICFAI university

Comments

  1. ❤🧏‍♂️🧏‍♂️🧏‍♂️🧏‍♂️

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hanging and Strangulation: A medico-legal analysis

                                                                                                                             Chirag Goyal                                                                                                                              I.             Table of Contents II.  ...

Senior Advocates : Ethics and Duties - By P.S. Khurana

    Senior Advocates : Ethics and Duties - P.S. Khurana * Legal education in India is regulated by the Bar Council of India, which is a statutory body constituted under the Advocates Act. 1961.   There are two ways to obtain the degree to practice law and enroll with the Bar Council of India : (1)      a 3-year LL.B program which requires a prior graduate degree ; and (2)     a 5-year integrated B.A., LL.B. program which can commence immediately after secondary school. Some Universities offer both the five-year and three-year degree program 1 . The advocates enrolled in India are only entitled to ‘practice the profession of law’, which includes not only appearing before courts and giving legal advice as an attorney, but also drafting legal documents, advising clients on international standards and carrying out customary practices and transactions 2 . At the State level the Bar Council of India perform oversight functions and...

The Largest Democracy’s Undemocratic Parliament

  The Largest Democracy’s Undemocratic Parliament - Rohan Choudhary* This monsoon session was the fourth consecutive session of the parliament which was called off before the schedule, barring the winter session of 2020 (which was cancelled due to the pandemic). The opposition kept the parliament at standstill, demanding to have a fair and square discussion on the important issues such as Pegasus Spyware, Farm Laws etc. Now there are two ways to look at this issue, which depends on what side of political fence you stand on. Looking it from the government point of view, there stand have been that parliament can’t function amidst all the chaos and ruckus created by the opposition. If you are on other side, you may hold the view that it’s the fundamental duty of the opposition to hold the government accountable. The pertinent question that needs to be addressed here is about the means used by the opposition to register their protest. Is it right to keep the parliament at standst...