Skip to main content

What is Meaning of Remuneration.

The word remuneration finds its origin in the Latin term, ‘remuneration,’ meaning ‘reward’ or ‘repayment.’ If one look for general meaning of remuneration it means the money paid for work or a service.

Under the EQUAL REMUNERATION ACT, 1976[1] of section 2(g) “remuneration” means the basic wage or salary, and any additional emoluments whatsoever payable, either in cash or in kind, to a person employed in respect of employment or work done in such employment, if the terms of the contract of employment, express or implied, were fulfilled.

When one looks at the definition, it is evident that the term remuneration has a broader sense than phrases like pay or earnings. It represents all of the methods in which an employee is compensated for labor and his or her role in the task done by him or her. So, an employee's remuneration comprises not only his base income, but also any bonuses, commission payments, overtime pay, or other financial perks that he receives from his employer. It should also be emphasized that this additional emolument can take the shape of monetary or non-monetary incentives and allowances such as medical plans, housing, meals, or a company automobile, among other things.

According to the rules of the employment contract, the employer typically pays this compensation afterward. As a result, it can be awarded based on the service provided and the terms chosen and accepted by the parties.

Section 219 of the Contracts Act provides that an agent has the right to obtain the agreed remuneration or, in the absence of an agreement, a reasonable remuneration for delivering services to the principal that are neither voluntary nor gratuitous. He becomes qualified to get the remuneration as soon as the work he conducted is completed.



[1] Act 25 of 1976 amended by Act 49 of 1987                                                                                                

                                                                               URMILA

3rd year B.A.LLB, Army Institute of Law

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hanging and Strangulation: A medico-legal analysis

                                                                                                                             Chirag Goyal                                                                                                                              I.             Table of Contents II.  ...

Senior Advocates : Ethics and Duties - By P.S. Khurana

    Senior Advocates : Ethics and Duties - P.S. Khurana * Legal education in India is regulated by the Bar Council of India, which is a statutory body constituted under the Advocates Act. 1961.   There are two ways to obtain the degree to practice law and enroll with the Bar Council of India : (1)      a 3-year LL.B program which requires a prior graduate degree ; and (2)     a 5-year integrated B.A., LL.B. program which can commence immediately after secondary school. Some Universities offer both the five-year and three-year degree program 1 . The advocates enrolled in India are only entitled to ‘practice the profession of law’, which includes not only appearing before courts and giving legal advice as an attorney, but also drafting legal documents, advising clients on international standards and carrying out customary practices and transactions 2 . At the State level the Bar Council of India perform oversight functions and...

The Largest Democracy’s Undemocratic Parliament

  The Largest Democracy’s Undemocratic Parliament - Rohan Choudhary* This monsoon session was the fourth consecutive session of the parliament which was called off before the schedule, barring the winter session of 2020 (which was cancelled due to the pandemic). The opposition kept the parliament at standstill, demanding to have a fair and square discussion on the important issues such as Pegasus Spyware, Farm Laws etc. Now there are two ways to look at this issue, which depends on what side of political fence you stand on. Looking it from the government point of view, there stand have been that parliament can’t function amidst all the chaos and ruckus created by the opposition. If you are on other side, you may hold the view that it’s the fundamental duty of the opposition to hold the government accountable. The pertinent question that needs to be addressed here is about the means used by the opposition to register their protest. Is it right to keep the parliament at standst...